Green Liberal Democrats: "Liberal Democrats believe that by helping the environment, we can help our own pockets, our families, our communities and our world."

GM PUBLIC DEBATE WAS A FIG LEAF - GEORGE

12.00.00am GMT Wed 19th Nov 2003

Commenting ahead of the EFRA Select Committee's report on the GM public debate, Liberal Democrat Shadow Rural Affairs Secretary, Andrew George MP, has called for the debate to be re-run now that much more information is available.

The Government-sponsored GM Nation debate was completed before crucial scientific evidence from the GM Science Review, the Farm Scale Evaluations and the Strategy Unit's Economic Review was available.

Mr George said:

"The GM Nation debate should have provoked informed discussion about a difficult issue. But it had no chance of success with its limited funding and poor timing.

"The Government was in too much of a rush to allow commercial planting of GMs and the public was asked its opinion with none of the crucial scientific evidence.

"All the reports commissioned by the Government have raised grave doubts about GMs. Yet next month it looks likely that the Government will happily stand by as GM corn is approved by a EU committee. The slippery slope of sleepwalking into making a big decision through small incremental steps appears to be all before us.

"We now know that the GM debate was a fig leaf as the decision had already been made."

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story.
Previous news story: BRITAIN FACED WITH 27% INCREASE IN ABANDONED CAR MOUNTAIN - BAKER (Tue 18th Nov 2003).
Next news story: AIRPORT DEBATE MUST FOCUS ON SUSTAINABILITY - MARSDEN (Wed 19th Nov 2003).

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 82b Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BX.
Published and promoted by Green Liberal Democrats, 39 Azof Street, Greenwich, London SE10 0EG.
The views expressed in all articles and news items of this site should only be assumed to be those of the individual authors themselves and are not necessarily those of the Liberal Democrats, the Green Liberal Democrats, or the service provider.