![]() |
![]() |
| Green Liberal Democrats | <info@greenlibdems.org.uk> | 25th July 2008 |
Aviation White Paper adopts long standing Liberal Democrat policy - Thurso12.00.00am GMT Tue 16th Dec 2003 The Aviation White Paper launched today has seen the Government adopt several long-standing Liberal Democrat policies on the future of air travel in the UK. A motion at The Liberal Democrat Party Conference in 2002 called for the following measures that appear in today's white paper. Introducing the principle of 'polluter pays' to the aviation industry. Abandon 'predict and provide' policy in airport development. Develop regional international airports. Restrictions on the expansion of night flights. Reject proposals for entirely new airports. Increase landing charges at major airports such as Gatwick and Heathrow. Responding to the White Paper, John Thurso MP, Liberal Democrat Shadow Transport Secretary, said: "The Government have finally adopted the Liberal Democrat approach to the future of the aviation industry and accepted our long term policies of ending 'predict and provide' and introducing the 'polluter pays' concept to the aviation industry. These are long standing Liberal Democrat policies and their adoption by Government comes not a moment too soon. "However the Government have completely fudged the details of how these policies will be introduced. There is a clear gap between the acceptance of our position on aviation and their actual implementation by a Government discredited on transport and environmental policy."
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Tue 20th Jul 2004: Transport White Paper must have a long term strategy - Thurso. Sun 28th Mar 2004: SCOTLAND: Lib Dems launch new aviation policy. Mon 15th Mar 2004: MPs slam government for its damaging aviation policy - Thurso. Tue 9th Dec 2003: Published and promoted by Green Liberal Democrats, 39 Azof Street, Greenwich, London SE10 0EG. The views expressed in all articles and news items of this site should only be assumed to be those of the individual authors themselves and are not necessarily those of the Liberal Democrats, the Green Liberal Democrats, or the service provider. |