Green Liberal Democrats: "Liberal Democrats believe that by helping the environment, we can help our own pockets, our families, our communities and our world."

Government wrong to attempt to water down emissions trading system

12.00.00am BST (GMT +0100) Tue 18th Oct 2005

The European Court will today hear the UK's legal challenge against the European Commission and their rejection of the UK's proposed amendment to reduce the total quantity of allowances in the UK's National Allocation Plan (NAP) for Phase 1 (2005-2007) of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS).

Commenting, Liberal Democrat Shadow Environment Secretary, Norman Baker MP said:

"It is incredible that whilst DEFRA, is talking big on climate change, it's still attempting to take legal action against the European Commission in a ludicrous attempt to water down our emissions targets.

"The latest statistics show greenhouse gas emissions rising, meaning we may miss our targets under the Kyoto protocol. Yet again Labour's actions are failing to match their words on climate change.

"I call on them again to enter into a cross-party dialogue to reach political consensus on how we can achieve the real reductions needed."

Emissions Statistics

  • Emissions of CO2 up 3% under Labour since 1997 (to 2004)

  • All gases (ie: Kyoto) up 1% in the last year 2003 to 2004

Related Link:

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story.
Previous news story: Time to Scrap Nuclear Power (Wed 21st Sep 2005).
Next news story: Reducing carbon emissions needs leadership from central government (Sat 22nd Oct 2005).

Related News Story:

Thu 10th Jan 2008:

Thu 6th May 2004:

Wed 21st Apr 2004:

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 82b Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BX.
Published and promoted by Green Liberal Democrats, 39 Azof Street, Greenwich, London SE10 0EG.
The views expressed in all articles and news items of this site should only be assumed to be those of the individual authors themselves and are not necessarily those of the Liberal Democrats, the Green Liberal Democrats, or the service provider.